Filed: Nov. 10, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 11-11716 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar NOVEMBER 10, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 6:10-cr-00152-JA-KRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllPlaintiff-Appellee, versus WILLIAM A. STOTLAR, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (November 10, 2011) Before BARKETT, HULL and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIA
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 11-11716 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar NOVEMBER 10, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 6:10-cr-00152-JA-KRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllPlaintiff-Appellee, versus WILLIAM A. STOTLAR, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (November 10, 2011) Before BARKETT, HULL and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 11-11716 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar NOVEMBER 10, 2011
________________________ JOHN LEY
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 6:10-cr-00152-JA-KRS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllPlaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM A. STOTLAR,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(November 10, 2011)
Before BARKETT, HULL and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Craig Crawford, appointed counsel for William Stotlar in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Stotlar’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2