Montijo v. Ryan, CV-13-01439-TUC-DCB. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20181220868
Visitors: 19
Filed: Dec. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2018
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. BURY , District Judge . On June 19, 2017, this Court found that material issues of fact existed as to whether Defendants Swaney and Bennett were deliberately indifferent to Plaintiff's serious medical needs when Plaintiff and several other inmates fell ill from botulism poisoning. 1 The Court found that qualified immunity did not preclude this case and denied summary judgment for Defendants Swaney and Bennett. (Order (Doc. 110)). Defendants Swaney and Bennett appealed. On O
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. BURY , District Judge . On June 19, 2017, this Court found that material issues of fact existed as to whether Defendants Swaney and Bennett were deliberately indifferent to Plaintiff's serious medical needs when Plaintiff and several other inmates fell ill from botulism poisoning. 1 The Court found that qualified immunity did not preclude this case and denied summary judgment for Defendants Swaney and Bennett. (Order (Doc. 110)). Defendants Swaney and Bennett appealed. On Oc..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. BURY, District Judge.
On June 19, 2017, this Court found that material issues of fact existed as to whether Defendants Swaney and Bennett were deliberately indifferent to Plaintiff's serious medical needs when Plaintiff and several other inmates fell ill from botulism poisoning.1 The Court found that qualified immunity did not preclude this case and denied summary judgment for Defendants Swaney and Bennett. (Order (Doc. 110)).
Defendants Swaney and Bennett appealed. On October 30, 2018, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed this Court's decision. The Mandate issued on December 12, 2018.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that, within 30 days of the filing date of this Order, the parties shall file the Joint Proposed Pretrial Order. The parties shall include in the Proposed Pretrial Order whether this case should be consolidated for trial with CV 13-691 TUC DCB.2
IT IS FURTHER ORERED that the parties should inform the Court as to whether a settlement conference should be held before a magistrate judge prior to the Court holding the Pretrial Conference and setting the trial date.
FootNotes
1. The Court previously dismissed Defendants Robinson, Suarez, and Ryan. (Order (Doc. 53)). Defendant Sanchez was dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Doc. 59.)
2. The companion case, CV 13-1141 TUC DCB, was voluntarily dismissed by stipulation of the parties on February 5, 2018.
Source: Leagle
