Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

PEARSON v. PEA RIVER ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., 1:14-CV-347-WKW[WO]. (2014)

Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama Number: infdco20141208619 Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 05, 2014
Summary: ORDER W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief District Judge. Before the court are the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 41) and Plaintiffs' objections (Doc. # 43). Based upon an independent and de novo review of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, see 28 U.S.C. 636(b), it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiffs' objections (Doc. # 43) are OVERRULED; 2. the Recommendation (Doc. # 41) is ADOPTED; 3. the motion to dismiss and compel arbitration (Doc. # 15) filed
More

ORDER

W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief District Judge.

Before the court are the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 41) and Plaintiffs' objections (Doc. # 43). Based upon an independent and de novo review of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), it is ORDERED as follows:

1. Plaintiffs' objections (Doc. # 43) are OVERRULED;

2. the Recommendation (Doc. # 41) is ADOPTED;

3. the motion to dismiss and compel arbitration (Doc. # 15) filed by Pea River Electric Cooperative, Inc. ("Cooperative") is DENIED in part only as to Plaintiffs' FDCPA claim against the Cooperative;

4. Plaintiffs' FDCPA claim against the Cooperative is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and

5. Plaintiffs' remaining state law claims against the Cooperative are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3).

A final judgment will be entered separately.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer