COPELAND v. ARMY FLEET SUPPORT, 1:14cv223-MHT. (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20150527901
Visitors: 9
Filed: May 26, 2015
Latest Update: May 26, 2015
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Plaintiff filed this lawsuit asserting that defendant, his former employer, disciplined and subsequently terminated him on the basis of race and in retaliation for his complaints to supervisors about racial discrimination, and subjected him to a hostile-work environment on the basis of race. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that defendant's motion for summary judgment should be grant
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Plaintiff filed this lawsuit asserting that defendant, his former employer, disciplined and subsequently terminated him on the basis of race and in retaliation for his complaints to supervisors about racial discrimination, and subjected him to a hostile-work environment on the basis of race. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that defendant's motion for summary judgment should be grante..
More
OPINION
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff filed this lawsuit asserting that defendant, his former employer, disciplined and subsequently terminated him on the basis of race and in retaliation for his complaints to supervisors about racial discrimination, and subjected him to a hostile-work environment on the basis of race. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that defendant's motion for summary judgment should be granted. There are no objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the magistrate judge's recommendation should be adopted.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
Source: Leagle
