Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Autoliv ASP, Inc. v. Hyundai Mobisco., Ltd., 2:13cv141-ECM. (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama Number: infdco20181004d12 Visitors: 14
Filed: Oct. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 03, 2018
Summary: ORDER EMILY C. MARKS , District Judge . On August 10, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (doc. # 105) to which no timely objections have been filed. There being no objections filed to the Recommendation, and after an independent and de novo review of the record and the Recommendation, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is due to be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (doc. # 108) be and is he
More

ORDER

On August 10, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (doc. # 105) to which no timely objections have been filed. There being no objections filed to the Recommendation, and after an independent and de novo review of the record and the Recommendation, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is due to be adopted. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that:

1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (doc. # 108) be and is hereby ADOPTED;

2. The Defendants' proposed construction of the claim term "terminal end," be and is hereby REJECTED and the plain and ordinary meaning of the term known to persons of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention be and is hereby ADOPTED; and

3. This case be and is hereby REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer