Wykoff v. Woods, 2:19-CV-72-WHA. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20190606c14
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 04, 2019
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . This 28 U.S.C. 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus is before the court on the May 14, 2019 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #36). There being no timely objection to the Recommendation, and after an independent review of the file, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. To the extent the petitioner seeks an immediate award of good time credit under the provisions of the First Ste
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . This 28 U.S.C. 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus is before the court on the May 14, 2019 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #36). There being no timely objection to the Recommendation, and after an independent review of the file, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. To the extent the petitioner seeks an immediate award of good time credit under the provisions of the First Step..
More
ORDER
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge.
This 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus is before the court on the May 14, 2019 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #36). There being no timely objection to the Recommendation, and after an independent review of the file, it is
ORDERED that:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED;
2. To the extent the petitioner seeks an immediate award of good time credit under the provisions of the First Step Act of 2018, this claim is dismissed without prejudice as such claim is premature;
3. This case, with respect to the petitioner's challenges to the constitutionality of a disciplinary action for improper use of mail, is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings.
Source: Leagle
