IPFS CORPORATION v. CARRILLO, 2:14-cv-00509-GMN-NJK. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20150708d21
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jul. 07, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 07, 2015
Summary: ORDER (Docket No. 83) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's renewed motion to reopen discovery. Docket No. 76. Defendant filed a response, along with a counter-motion to exclude. Docket Nos. 81, 82. Plaintiff filed a reply. Docket No. 83. Plaintiff's reply asserts that the time-frame for filing the reply did not allow it sufficient time to address all issues raised in Defendant's response and counter-motion. See id. at 3. 1 The reply brief purports
Summary: ORDER (Docket No. 83) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's renewed motion to reopen discovery. Docket No. 76. Defendant filed a response, along with a counter-motion to exclude. Docket Nos. 81, 82. Plaintiff filed a reply. Docket No. 83. Plaintiff's reply asserts that the time-frame for filing the reply did not allow it sufficient time to address all issues raised in Defendant's response and counter-motion. See id. at 3. 1 The reply brief purports t..
More
ORDER
(Docket No. 83)
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's renewed motion to reopen discovery. Docket No. 76. Defendant filed a response, along with a counter-motion to exclude. Docket Nos. 81, 82. Plaintiff filed a reply. Docket No. 83. Plaintiff's reply asserts that the time-frame for filing the reply did not allow it sufficient time to address all issues raised in Defendant's response and counter-motion. See id. at 3.1 The reply brief purports to incorporate by reference the arguments raised in Plaintiff's forthcoming response to the counter-motion. See id.
The Court hereby STRIKES the reply brief (Docket No. 83). No later than July 10, 2015, Plaintiff shall file a reply to the motion to reopen discovery and a response to the counter-motion. Plaintiff is not permitted to incorporate by reference arguments made elsewhere. Defendant's reply to her counter-motion shall be filed no later than July 15, 2015.2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The reply brief was due on July 6, 2015 pursuant to the parties' stipulation. See Docket No. 80.
2. If either or both parties believe a briefing schedule set by the Court does not provide sufficient time to prepare their briefs, the proper means for seeking relief is to file a request with the Court for an extension.
Source: Leagle
