U.S. v. MARSH, CR13-08208-001-PCT-MEA. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20141231797
Visitors: 20
Filed: Dec. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 30, 2014
Summary: ORDER MARK E. ASPEY, Magistrate Judge. The defendant appeared in court with counsel. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3148 a pretrial release revocation hearing was held. The Court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant has violated the terms of defendant's previously imposed pretrial release conditions as alleged in the Petition to Revoke. After considering the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. 3142(g), the court concludes there are no conditions or combination of conditions which will
Summary: ORDER MARK E. ASPEY, Magistrate Judge. The defendant appeared in court with counsel. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3148 a pretrial release revocation hearing was held. The Court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant has violated the terms of defendant's previously imposed pretrial release conditions as alleged in the Petition to Revoke. After considering the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. 3142(g), the court concludes there are no conditions or combination of conditions which will ..
More
ORDER
MARK E. ASPEY, Magistrate Judge.
The defendant appeared in court with counsel. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3148 a pretrial release revocation hearing was held. The Court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant has violated the terms of defendant's previously imposed pretrial release conditions as alleged in the Petition to Revoke. After considering the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. §3142(g), the court concludes there are no conditions or combination of conditions which will assure the defendant will not flee or pose a danger to the safety of other persons or the community and that if there were such conditions the defendant is unlikely to abide by such conditions.
IT IS ORDERED that the defendant be detained.
Source: Leagle
