Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, 2:15-cv-00813-RFB-GWF. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160812c83 Visitors: 22
Filed: Aug. 11, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 11, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A REPLY TO SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION'S SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RESPONSE TO ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (First Request) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , Magistrate Judge . It is hereby stipulated by and between all parties to this case including Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo"), Southern Highlands Community Association (the "Association"), SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR"), and Alessi & Koenig, LLC ("
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A REPLY TO SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION'S SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RESPONSE TO ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (First Request)

It is hereby stipulated by and between all parties to this case including Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo"), Southern Highlands Community Association (the "Association"), SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR"), and Alessi & Koenig, LLC ("Alessi" and jointly with Wells Fargo, the Association, and SFR, the "Parties"), by and through their attorneys of record as follows:

The Association filed its Response to Wells Fargo's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 59) on August 1, 2016. Wells Fargo's reply in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 56) is currently due August 18, 2016. Additionally, the Association filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 61) to which a response by Wells Fargo is due August 25, 2016.

The Parties stipulate and agree that Wells Fargo shall have until August 29, 2016, in which to file its reply in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment and its response to the Association's Motion for Summary Judgment. This is the Parties' first request for an extension of time to file a response and reply and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party. Rather, the parties have agreed to the extension as an accommodation to Wells Fargo and as a professional courtesy.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer