CARTHEN v. MARSHALL, 2:10-CV-334-WKW. (2013)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20130603610
Visitors: 16
Filed: May 31, 2013
Latest Update: May 31, 2013
Summary: ORDER W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief District Judge. The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #52) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation (Doc. #52) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. Defendants' motions for summary judgment are GRANTED; 3. This action is DI
Summary: ORDER W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief District Judge. The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #52) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation (Doc. #52) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. Defendants' motions for summary judgment are GRANTED; 3. This action is DIS..
More
ORDER
W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief District Judge.
The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #52) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that:
1. The Recommendation (Doc. #52) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED;
2. Defendants' motions for summary judgment are GRANTED;
3. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice; and
4. The costs of this proceeding are TAXED against Plaintiff.
A separate judgment will be entered.
Source: Leagle
