CARTER BROTHERS MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. v. LUMBERMEN'S UNDERWRITING ALLIANCE, 2:11cv251-MHT. (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20120730399
Visitors: 4
Attorneys: More Attorneys
Filed: Jul. 27, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 27, 2012
Summary: ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. Based on the representations made to the court in an on-the-record conference call on July 27, 2012, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The motion for reconsideration (Doc. No. 230) is granted as to the bad-faith claim and denied in all other respects. During the conference call, the court stated its reasons for its denial of summary judgment as to all claims except the bad-faith claim. (2) The bad-faith claim, Count II of the amended complaint (Doc. No. 2
Summary: ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. Based on the representations made to the court in an on-the-record conference call on July 27, 2012, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The motion for reconsideration (Doc. No. 230) is granted as to the bad-faith claim and denied in all other respects. During the conference call, the court stated its reasons for its denial of summary judgment as to all claims except the bad-faith claim. (2) The bad-faith claim, Count II of the amended complaint (Doc. No. 28..
More
ORDER
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Based on the representations made to the court in an on-the-record conference call on July 27, 2012, it is ORDERED as follows:
(1) The motion for reconsideration (Doc. No. 230) is granted as to the bad-faith claim and denied in all other respects. During the conference call, the court stated its reasons for its denial of summary judgment as to all claims except the bad-faith claim.
(2) The bad-faith claim, Count II of the amended complaint (Doc. No. 28), is dismissed.
(3) The alternative motion for certification of the denial of summary judgment for appeal (Doc. No. 230) is denied.
It is further ORDERED that the motion for clarification (Doc. No. 234) is granted as follows:
(1) By agreement of the parties, all issues as to third-party defendants Regions Bank, First Commercial Bank, and Industrial Development Board of the City of Brundidge are to be resolved non-jury after the jury trial.
(2) Third party defendants Regions Bank, First Commercial Bank, and Industrial Development Board of the City of Brundidge are excused from participation in the jury trial.
It is further ORDERED that the motion for leave not to have corporate representatives at trial, etc. (Doc. No. 249) is denied as moot.
It is further ORDERED that the motion to strike (Doc. No. 246) is denied.
It is further ORDERED that third-party defendants Marlin Business Bank and Wells Fargo Equipment Finance, Inc. are dismissed and terminated as parties.
Source: Leagle
