U.S. v. WINDLEY, CR 10-660-2-PHX-DGC. (2013)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20130906592
Visitors: 32
Filed: Sep. 05, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 05, 2013
Summary: ORDER DAVID G. CAMPBELL, District Judge. Defendant has filed a motion to unseal 289 items on Clerk's docket for purposes of appeal. Doc. 508. The motion asks that the Court's staff provide copies of the docket filings to appellate counsel. A review of the docket reflects, however, that many of the identified docket items relate to defendants other than George Calvin Windley. It appears that appellate counsel has asked the Court to provide copies of every sealed item in the docket. This reques
Summary: ORDER DAVID G. CAMPBELL, District Judge. Defendant has filed a motion to unseal 289 items on Clerk's docket for purposes of appeal. Doc. 508. The motion asks that the Court's staff provide copies of the docket filings to appellate counsel. A review of the docket reflects, however, that many of the identified docket items relate to defendants other than George Calvin Windley. It appears that appellate counsel has asked the Court to provide copies of every sealed item in the docket. This request..
More
ORDER
DAVID G. CAMPBELL, District Judge.
Defendant has filed a motion to unseal 289 items on Clerk's docket for purposes of appeal. Doc. 508. The motion asks that the Court's staff provide copies of the docket filings to appellate counsel. A review of the docket reflects, however, that many of the identified docket items relate to defendants other than George Calvin Windley. It appears that appellate counsel has asked the Court to provide copies of every sealed item in the docket.
This request is overly broad and would impose an undue burden on the Court's staff. Defendant's motion is denied without prejudice to re-filing of a motion that focuses on docket entries truly relevant to Mr. Windley's appeal.
Source: Leagle
