U.S. v. BRADBERRY, 3:07cr11/MCR/EMT (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20140616971
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jun. 12, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2014
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated May 23, 2014. (Doc. 89). Defendant has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objectio
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated May 23, 2014. (Doc. 89). Defendant has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objection..
More
ORDER
M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated May 23, 2014. (Doc. 89). Defendant has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. Defendant's motion for leave of court to file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED, and the incorporated § 2255 motion to vacate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (doc. 88), is DENIED and DISMISSED without prejudice.
3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
