U.S. v. Lane, 1:17-CR-331-WKW. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20180423510
Visitors: 22
Filed: Apr. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 20, 2018
Summary: ORDER W. KEITH WATKINS , Chief District Judge . On December 6, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 35) that Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence (Doc. # 20) be denied. Defendant timely objected to the Recommendation. (Doc. # 45.) Upon an independent and de novo review of the record and Recommendation, Defendant's objections are due to be overruled, and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is due to be adopted. Defendant's objections mostly rehash arguments he m
Summary: ORDER W. KEITH WATKINS , Chief District Judge . On December 6, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 35) that Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence (Doc. # 20) be denied. Defendant timely objected to the Recommendation. (Doc. # 45.) Upon an independent and de novo review of the record and Recommendation, Defendant's objections are due to be overruled, and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is due to be adopted. Defendant's objections mostly rehash arguments he ma..
More
ORDER
W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief District Judge.
On December 6, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 35) that Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence (Doc. # 20) be denied. Defendant timely objected to the Recommendation. (Doc. # 45.) Upon an independent and de novo review of the record and Recommendation, Defendant's objections are due to be overruled, and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is due to be adopted.
Defendant's objections mostly rehash arguments he made in his motion and at the suppression hearing. The Magistrate Judge adequately addressed those arguments in his Recommendation and properly rejected them. To the extent Defendant objects on grounds not addressed in the Recommendation, those grounds are without merit and warrant no discussion.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. The Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. # 35) is ADOPTED;
2. Defendant's objections (Doc. # 45) are OVERRULED;
3. Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence (Doc. # 20) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
