Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

King County v. Travelers Indemnity Company, 2:14-cv-01957 BJR. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20190530h13 Visitors: 9
Filed: May 29, 2019
Latest Update: May 29, 2019
Summary: STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BARBARA JACOBS ROTHSTEIN , District Judge . Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and following the Court's Order Granting Employers Insurance of Wausau's Sealed Motion for Order Approving Settlement and Barring Contribution Claims (Dkt. 777), plaintiff, King County, and defendant, Employers Insurance of Wausau, formerly known as Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin ("Wausau"), acting by and through their respectiv
More

STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and following the Court's Order Granting Employers Insurance of Wausau's Sealed Motion for Order Approving Settlement and Barring Contribution Claims (Dkt. 777), plaintiff, King County, and defendant, Employers Insurance of Wausau, formerly known as Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin ("Wausau"), acting by and through their respective undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate that King County's claims against Wausau, and Wausau's counterclaim against King County, in the above-captioned matter, under Wausau policy nos. 2325-00-034044 and 2335-00-034044, are dismissed with prejudice, and without an award of fees or costs to either party. This stipulation does not affect the remaining claims of King County in its Fourth Amended Complaint against any other defendant.

AGREED AND STIPULATED.

ORDER

Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and following the Court's Order Granting Employers Insurance of Wausau's Sealed Motion for Order Approving Settlement and Barring Contribution Claims (Dkt. 777), King County's claims against Wausau, and Wausau's counterclaim against King County, in the above-captioned matter, under Wausau policy nos. 2325-00-034044 and 2335-00-034044, are dismissed with prejudice, and without an award of fees or costs to either party.

This Order does not affect the remaining claims of King County in its Fourth Amended Complaint against any other defendant.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer