JACKSON v. HALCYON REHABILITATION, LLC, 13-00639-KD-M. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20140512i02
Visitors: 16
Filed: May 09, 2014
Latest Update: May 09, 2014
Summary: ORDER KRISTI K. DuBOSE, District Judge. After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 34) to which objection (Doc. 35) is made, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 34) of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED in part as the opinion of this Court, as follows: • The Court adopts in full the reasoning set forth in pages 1-6 and adopts page 7 through the paragraph endi
Summary: ORDER KRISTI K. DuBOSE, District Judge. After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 34) to which objection (Doc. 35) is made, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 34) of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED in part as the opinion of this Court, as follows: • The Court adopts in full the reasoning set forth in pages 1-6 and adopts page 7 through the paragraph endin..
More
ORDER
KRISTI K. DuBOSE, District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 34) to which objection (Doc. 35) is made, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 34) of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED in part as the opinion of this Court, as follows:
• The Court adopts in full the reasoning set forth in pages 1-6 and adopts page 7 through the paragraph ending with "wherein Jackson's job responsibilities had to be modified so that she could perform them." The Court declines to adopt the remainder of the Report and Recommendation.
• The Court adopts the recommendation that the pending Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 18) be denied.
• The Court declines to adopt the recommendation that the Motion to Strike (Doc. 23) be granted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count Two of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. 18) is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike (Doc. 23) is MOOT.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
