Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BOURNE VALLEY COURT TRUST v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 2:13-cv-00649-JCM-GWF. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20171010d86 Visitors: 21
Filed: Oct. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 06, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 90) (Second Request) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1 and 7-1, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo"), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("Freddie Mac"), Bourne Valley Court Trust ("Bourne Valley"), and The Parks Homeowners Association ("HOA" and together with Wells Fargo, Freddie Mac, and Bourne Valley the "Parties"), through their counsel of record, stipulate as follows:
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 90)

(Second Request)

Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1 and 7-1, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo"), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("Freddie Mac"), Bourne Valley Court Trust ("Bourne Valley"), and The Parks Homeowners Association ("HOA" and together with Wells Fargo, Freddie Mac, and Bourne Valley the "Parties"), through their counsel of record, stipulate as follows:

On September 8, 2017, the HOA filed a Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim ("Motion") (ECF No. 90). A response to the Motion would have been due September 22, 2017 under the Rules, and the HOA's reply would have been due September 29, 2017. Under the first extension, a response to the Motion was due October 9, 2017, and the HOA's reply would have been due October 16, 2017. For the convenience of the Parties and in order to address the rapidly evolving law, the Parties stipulate and agree to extend the briefing schedule and the timing for responses and replies to the Motion. In addition, the parties are engaging in discussions in an attempt to resolve aspects of this matter, which could narrow further briefing or render it unnecessary.

The Parties agree that any response to the Motion will be due October 23, 2017, with any reply due October 30, 2017. The Parties stipulate and agree to the foregoing in good faith. This Stipulation is made for the benefit and convenience of the Parties and is not intended to delay the proceedings in this case.

IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer