Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Mathis, 1:16-cr-10004. (2018)

Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20180323953 Visitors: 27
Filed: Mar. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 22, 2018
Summary: ORDER HARRY F. BARNES , District Judge . Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed February 28, 2018, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 85. On April 24, 2017, Defendant filed a pro se Motion to Order Refund of Attorney's Fees, requesting that the Court order his former attorney in the above-captioned case—Floyd Mattison Thomas, III—to refund the retainer he paid. ECF No. 45. Judge Bryant recommends
More

ORDER

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed February 28, 2018, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 85. On April 24, 2017, Defendant filed a pro se Motion to Order Refund of Attorney's Fees, requesting that the Court order his former attorney in the above-captioned case—Floyd Mattison Thomas, III—to refund the retainer he paid. ECF No. 45. Judge Bryant recommends that Defendant's motion should be dismissed without prejudice because the Court lacks jurisdiction to hear Defendant's claim. No party has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Upon review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto. Accordingly, Defendant's motion is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer