HAWKINS-BEY v. WHITE, 11-00612-KD-B. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20120716698
Visitors: 31
Filed: Jul. 13, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 13, 2012
Summary: ORDER KRISTI K. DuBOSE, District Judge. After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED due to Petitioner's failure to comply with 28 U.S.
Summary: ORDER KRISTI K. DuBOSE, District Judge. After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED due to Petitioner's failure to comply with 28 U.S.C..
More
ORDER
KRISTI K. DuBOSE, District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.
It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED due to Petitioner's failure to comply with 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). Petitioner is not entitled to a Certificate of Appealability and is not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.
DONE.
Source: Leagle
