Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Tate, 18-00212-WS-N. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama Number: infdco20190918667 Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 27, 2019
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY KATHERINE P. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . The Defendant, DANNY JAMAL TATE, by consent (Doc. 79), appeared with his counsel of record, T. Jefferson Deen, Esq.,before the undersigned Magistrate Judge on August 27, 2019, pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count TWO of the Superseding Indictment charging a violation of 18 United States Code Section 922(g)(1), Possession of a Fire
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, DANNY JAMAL TATE, by consent (Doc. 79), appeared with his counsel of record, T. Jefferson Deen, Esq.,before the undersigned Magistrate Judge on August 27, 2019, pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count TWO of the Superseding Indictment charging a violation of 18 United States Code Section 922(g)(1), Possession of a Firearm by a Convicted Felon and Count THREE of the Superseding Indictment charging a violation of 18 Unites States Code Section 924(c)(1)(A)(i), Possessing a Firearm in Furtherance of a Drug Trafficking Crime.

After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, the undersigned has determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is supported by an independent basis in fact as to each of the essential elements of such offense. The undersigned Magistrate Judge therefore recommends that the plea of guilty be accepted and that the Defendant, DANNY JAMAL TATE, be adjudged guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly.

NOTICE TO PARTIES

A party has fourteen days from this date to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation's factual findings and legal conclusions. A party's failure to file written objections waives that party's right to challenge on appeal any un-objected-to factual finding or legal conclusion the district judge adopts from the Report and Recommendation. See 11th Cir. R. 3-1.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer