GOODMAN v. ALLEN, 2:11cv381-MHT(WO). (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20140930890
Visitors: 16
Filed: Sep. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 29, 2014
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, plaintiff, a state inmate, filed this lawsuit challenging the Alabama Corrections Department's alleged restrictions on the religious practices of Native Americans. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that this lawsuit be dismissed for two reasons: (1) plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies, for which defendants have filed a dismissal motion; and
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, plaintiff, a state inmate, filed this lawsuit challenging the Alabama Corrections Department's alleged restrictions on the religious practices of Native Americans. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that this lawsuit be dismissed for two reasons: (1) plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies, for which defendants have filed a dismissal motion; and (..
More
OPINION
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff, a state inmate, filed this lawsuit challenging the Alabama Corrections Department's alleged restrictions on the religious practices of Native Americans. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that this lawsuit be dismissed for two reasons: (1) plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies, for which defendants have filed a dismissal motion; and (2) plaintiff's failure to prosecute. There are no objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the magistrate judge's recommendation should be adopted.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
Source: Leagle
