Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Woodring v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., 2:19-cv-00030-JAD-VCF. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190311b51 Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 08, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR NAVIENT TO FILE AN ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (THIRD REQUEST) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff DAVID WOODRING ("Plaintiff") and Defendant NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC, incorrectly named NAVIENT in the Complaint, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and agree to extend the deadline from the current deadline of March 9, 2019 (ECF No. 19) to March 25, 2019, for Defendant NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC ("NSL"),
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR NAVIENT TO FILE AN ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

(THIRD REQUEST)

Plaintiff DAVID WOODRING ("Plaintiff") and Defendant NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC, incorrectly named NAVIENT in the Complaint, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and agree to extend the deadline from the current deadline of March 9, 2019 (ECF No. 19) to March 25, 2019, for Defendant NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC ("NSL"), to File an Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1).

On January 4, 2019, Plaintiff filed his Complaint. The claims at issue necessitate additional time for fact-finding, and the parties have been discussing the documents necessary to determine their respective claims and defenses in order to try and resolve this case. In fact, Plaintiff and NSL have been exchanging documents under a confidentiality agreement in order to try limit the issues and hopefully resolve this matter. NSL just disclosed additional documents on March 7, 2019, but Plaintiff requires additional time to review and digest the information in the documents. Plaintiff has no opposition to NSL's request for an extension until March 25, 2019 to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Moreover, NSL participated in the 26(f) conference with Plaintiff, and the extension should not impact any of the deadlines in the Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order that will soon be filed by the parties.

This is the third stipulation for extension of time for NSL to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint and is being made in good faith and not for purposes of undue delay. No additional requests for extensions are contemplated.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

The Stipulation for Extending Deadline for NSL to file an answer or otherwise respond up to and including March 25, 2019 is so ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer