EMERGENCY RESPONSE SPECIALISTS, INC. v. CSA OCEAN SCIENCES, INC., 2:14-cv-2214-WMA. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20160218891
Visitors: 12
Filed: Feb. 17, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 17, 2016
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER WILLIAM M. ACKER, Jr. , District Judge . Before the court is the motion by plaintiff's attorneys for leave to withdraw. (Doc. 30). Even though defendant's response to the motion is conciliatory, it detects the fatal flaw in the motion, namely that a corporation cannot litigate without a lawyer. Only if a lawyer licensed to practice in this court enters an appearance for plaintiff and in the appearance he or she formally agrees to be bound by the existing schedule
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER WILLIAM M. ACKER, Jr. , District Judge . Before the court is the motion by plaintiff's attorneys for leave to withdraw. (Doc. 30). Even though defendant's response to the motion is conciliatory, it detects the fatal flaw in the motion, namely that a corporation cannot litigate without a lawyer. Only if a lawyer licensed to practice in this court enters an appearance for plaintiff and in the appearance he or she formally agrees to be bound by the existing schedule,..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
WILLIAM M. ACKER, Jr., District Judge.
Before the court is the motion by plaintiff's attorneys for leave to withdraw. (Doc. 30). Even though defendant's response to the motion is conciliatory, it detects the fatal flaw in the motion, namely that a corporation cannot litigate without a lawyer. Only if a lawyer licensed to practice in this court enters an appearance for plaintiff and in the appearance he or she formally agrees to be bound by the existing schedule, will the court consider the motion for leave to withdraw. This should not be construed as a promise to grant the motion if or when this prerequisite is met. The motion is DENIED.
Source: Leagle