Filed: Feb. 13, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 09-16389 FEBRUARY 13, 2012 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 08-20767-CR-UU UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDUARDO LOPEZ-HERNANDEZ, a.k.a. Rashy, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (February 13, 2012) Before BARKETT, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 09-16389 FEBRUARY 13, 2012 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 08-20767-CR-UU UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDUARDO LOPEZ-HERNANDEZ, a.k.a. Rashy, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (February 13, 2012) Before BARKETT, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. ..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-16389 FEBRUARY 13, 2012
Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY
CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 08-20767-CR-UU
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
EDUARDO LOPEZ-HERNANDEZ,
a.k.a. Rashy,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(February 13, 2012)
Before BARKETT, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Alvin E. Entin, appointed counsel for Eduardo Lopez-Hernandez in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire
record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is
correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of
arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lopez-
Hernandez’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2