FORD v. SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC., 4:10-cv-00989-WMA-RRA. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20120710549
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 09, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 09, 2012
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM M. ACKER, Jr., District Judge. The magistrate judge filed a report on June 14, 2012, recommending that all claims in this action, except the state negligence claims, be dismissed with prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Although the plaintiff was expressly advised of her right to file specific written objections within fourteen days, she has failed to respond to the report and recommendation. H
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM M. ACKER, Jr., District Judge. The magistrate judge filed a report on June 14, 2012, recommending that all claims in this action, except the state negligence claims, be dismissed with prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Although the plaintiff was expressly advised of her right to file specific written objections within fourteen days, she has failed to respond to the report and recommendation. Ha..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILLIAM M. ACKER, Jr., District Judge.
The magistrate judge filed a report on June 14, 2012, recommending that all claims in this action, except the state negligence claims, be dismissed with prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Although the plaintiff was expressly advised of her right to file specific written objections within fourteen days, she has failed to respond to the report and recommendation.
Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's report is correct is all respects. Accordingly it is hereby ADOPTED as the opinion of the court. A separate order will be entered.
Source: Leagle
