Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. DERAMUS, 2:13cr27-MHT (WO). (2014)

Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama Number: infdco20140527a58 Visitors: 8
Filed: May 23, 2014
Latest Update: May 23, 2014
Summary: ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. Based on the representations made on the record on May 23, 2014, and by agreement of the parties, it is ORDERED that the government's first motion in limine (Doc. No. 93), seeking guidance on the admission of personal identifying information ("PII") and personal health information ("PHI") in light of the Middle District of Alabama's Local Rule 5.2, is granted. It is further ORDERED that: (1) The parties may submit unredacted exhibits containing PII an
More

ORDER

MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.

Based on the representations made on the record on May 23, 2014, and by agreement of the parties, it is ORDERED that the government's first motion in limine (Doc. No. 93), seeking guidance on the admission of personal identifying information ("PII") and personal health information ("PHI") in light of the Middle District of Alabama's Local Rule 5.2, is granted.

It is further ORDERED that:

(1) The parties may submit unredacted exhibits containing PII and PHI to the jury; however, the courtroom shall be arranged so that exhibits in the form of written documents containing PII and PHI shall be displayed only to the jury and shall not be visible to spectators. Jurors shall receive unredacted exhibits for their deliberations in the jury room. Unredacted exhibits admitted into evidence shall be placed under seal, and redacted exhibits shall be admitted into the public record.

(2) If the presentation of evidence requires PII or PHI to be elicited in audio form, then the courtroom shall be cleared prior to any presentation of PII or PHI in audio form.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer