SANDERSON v. MITCHEM, 6:11-cv-1732-SLB-PWG. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20140326967
Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 24, 2014
Summary: ORDER SHARON LOVELACE BLACKBURN, District Judge. In adopting and accepting the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, (doc. 11), the court considered the arguments presented in the Petition for Rehearing and Motion to Amend, (doc. 9). To that extent, the Motion is GRANTED. To the extent that the Motion seeks to amend the petition to include other arguments, the Motion is DENIED. In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered contemporaneously herewith, it is hereby ORDERED th
Summary: ORDER SHARON LOVELACE BLACKBURN, District Judge. In adopting and accepting the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, (doc. 11), the court considered the arguments presented in the Petition for Rehearing and Motion to Amend, (doc. 9). To that extent, the Motion is GRANTED. To the extent that the Motion seeks to amend the petition to include other arguments, the Motion is DENIED. In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered contemporaneously herewith, it is hereby ORDERED tha..
More
ORDER
SHARON LOVELACE BLACKBURN, District Judge.
In adopting and accepting the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, (doc. 11), the court considered the arguments presented in the Petition for Rehearing and Motion to Amend, (doc. 9). To that extent, the Motion is GRANTED. To the extent that the Motion seeks to amend the petition to include other arguments, the Motion is DENIED.
In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered contemporaneously herewith, it is hereby ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
The parties shall bear their own respective costs.
Source: Leagle
