Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Torres, 2:17-cv-1324-APG-PAL. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180925e78 Visitors: 13
Filed: Sep. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 24, 2018
Summary: Order Granting Motion to Lift Stay [ECF No. 20] ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . IT IS ORDERED that the motion to lift stay (ECF No. 20) is GRANTED. Within 60 days of the date of this order, the parties shall meet and confer as defined by Local Rule IA 1-3(f) regarding (1) a proposed scheduling order, (2) what discovery needs to be conducted, (3) what viable claims and defenses remain in the case in light of recent decisions from the Supreme Court of Nevada, and (4) the issues the par
More

Order Granting Motion to Lift Stay

[ECF No. 20]

IT IS ORDERED that the motion to lift stay (ECF No. 20) is GRANTED. Within 60 days of the date of this order, the parties shall meet and confer as defined by Local Rule IA 1-3(f) regarding (1) a proposed scheduling order, (2) what discovery needs to be conducted, (3) what viable claims and defenses remain in the case in light of recent decisions from the Supreme Court of Nevada, and (4) the issues the parties intend to raise in any dispositive motion the parties anticipate filing within the next 90 days. If discovery closed before the stay was entered, the court will not reopen discovery absent extraordinary circumstances. A party representative must attend the meet and confer, either in person or by telephone.

Within ten days after the meet-and-confer, the parties shall file a proposed scheduling order. Any dispositive motion filed within the next 90 days must contain a declaration by the movant's counsel that sets forth the details of the meet-and-confer and certifies that, despite good faith efforts, the issues raised in the motion could not be resolved. LR IA 1-3(f)(2).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer