PHELPS v. THOMAS, 12-0028-CB-M. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20120508550
Visitors: 15
Filed: May 07, 2012
Latest Update: May 07, 2012
Summary: ORDER CHARLES R. BUTLER, Jr., Senior District Judge. After due and proper consideration of all pleadings in this file, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that this habeas petition be DISMISSED as time-barred. It is further ORDERED that, should Petitioner file a certificate of appealability, it be DE
Summary: ORDER CHARLES R. BUTLER, Jr., Senior District Judge. After due and proper consideration of all pleadings in this file, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that this habeas petition be DISMISSED as time-barred. It is further ORDERED that, should Petitioner file a certificate of appealability, it be DEN..
More
ORDER
CHARLES R. BUTLER, Jr., Senior District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of all pleadings in this file, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court.
It is ORDERED that this habeas petition be DISMISSED as time-barred. It is further ORDERED that, should Petitioner file a certificate of appealability, it be DENIED as he is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis.
Source: Leagle
