Filed: Mar. 22, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 11-14104 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MARCH 22, 2012 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:06-cr-00181-KD-M-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JASON ALEXANDER EWING, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (March 22, 2012) Before EDMONDSON, MARCUS, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Elsi
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 11-14104 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MARCH 22, 2012 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:06-cr-00181-KD-M-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JASON ALEXANDER EWING, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (March 22, 2012) Before EDMONDSON, MARCUS, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Elsie..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 11-14104 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MARCH 22, 2012
Non-Argument Calendar
JOHN LEY
________________________ CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 1:06-cr-00181-KD-M-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JASON ALEXANDER EWING,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Alabama
_________________________
(March 22, 2012)
Before EDMONDSON, MARCUS, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Elsie Mae Miller, appointed counsel for Jason Ewing in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ewing’s revocation and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2