WATSON v. MOORE, 5:16-cv-379-DPM. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20170531a11
Visitors: 8
Filed: May 30, 2017
Latest Update: May 30, 2017
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr. , District Judge . Unopposed recommendation, N o 16 , adopted. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes). Moore and Jones's motion for summary judgment, N o 13, is granted. Watson's claims against them will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3). So Ordered.
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge.
Unopposed recommendation, No 16, adopted. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes). Moore and Jones's motion for summary judgment, N o 13, is granted. Watson's claims against them will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
