Jarrard v. Brazier, 1:18-cv-949-ECM. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20190624705
Filed: Jun. 21, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 21, 2019
Summary: ORDER EMILY C. MARKS , Chief District Judge . On May 24, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. 23). After an independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED that: 1. The United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (doc. 23) be and is hereby ADOPTED. 2. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (doc. 18) be and is hereby GRANTED to the extent that th
Summary: ORDER EMILY C. MARKS , Chief District Judge . On May 24, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. 23). After an independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED that: 1. The United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (doc. 23) be and is hereby ADOPTED. 2. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (doc. 18) be and is hereby GRANTED to the extent that the..
More
ORDER
EMILY C. MARKS, Chief District Judge.
On May 24, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. 23). After an independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is
ORDERED that:
1. The United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (doc. 23) be and is hereby ADOPTED.
2. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (doc. 18) be and is hereby GRANTED to the extent that the Defendants seek dismissal of this case due to the Plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust the administrative remedy previously available to him at the Houston County Jail prior to initiating this cause of action.
3. This case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) for the Plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy before seeking relief from this Court.
4. Other than the filing fee assessed in this case, no further costs are taxed.
A separate Judgment will be entered.
Source: Leagle
