Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Saticoy Bay LLC, 2:17-cv-00780-RFB-GWF. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180928g61
Visitors: 16
Filed: Sep. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 27, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO SATICOY BAY LLC SERIES 185 HILLPOINTE RD'S RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS (SECOND REQUEST) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo") and Defendants Saticoy Bay LLC, Series 1851 Hillpointe Rd ("Saticoy", collectively with Wells Fargo, the "Parties") hereby stipulate and agree, and respectfully request that the Court order, that the deadline for Wells Fargo's response to Saticoy's Renewed Motion t
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO SATICOY BAY LLC SERIES 185 HILLPOINTE RD'S RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS (SECOND REQUEST) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo") and Defendants Saticoy Bay LLC, Series 1851 Hillpointe Rd ("Saticoy", collectively with Wells Fargo, the "Parties") hereby stipulate and agree, and respectfully request that the Court order, that the deadline for Wells Fargo's response to Saticoy's Renewed Motion to..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO SATICOY BAY LLC SERIES 185 HILLPOINTE RD'S RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS
(SECOND REQUEST)
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, District Judge.
Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo") and Defendants Saticoy Bay LLC, Series 1851 Hillpointe Rd ("Saticoy", collectively with Wells Fargo, the "Parties") hereby stipulate and agree, and respectfully request that the Court order, that the deadline for Wells Fargo's response to Saticoy's Renewed Motion to Dismiss ("MTD") [ECF No. 32] may be extended from September 27, 2018 to October 11, 2018.
Wells Fargo is in the process of assessing the MTD filed by Saticoy and needs additional time to do so based on counsel's trial schedule. Additionally, the Parties are in settlement discussions to see if this matter can be resolved without need for briefing on the MTD or further expense in litigation. Accordingly, good cause exists for the extension.
Based on the foregoing, the Parties respectfully request that the Court grant this Stipulation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
