SCRUGGS v. DORNING, 5:11-cv-1514-IPJ-MHH. (2013)
Court: District Court, N.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20130912634
Visitors: 12
Filed: Sep. 11, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 11, 2013
Summary: MEMORANDUM OF OPINION INGE PRYTZ JOHNSON, Senior District Judge. The plaintiff, Ricky Lee Scruggs, hereinafter referred to as "the plaintiff," has filed a pro se complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, alleging that rights, privileges, or immunities afforded him under the Constitution or laws of the United States were abridged during his incarceration at the Madison Detention Facility. The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendation on August 22, 2013, recommending that summary judgme
Summary: MEMORANDUM OF OPINION INGE PRYTZ JOHNSON, Senior District Judge. The plaintiff, Ricky Lee Scruggs, hereinafter referred to as "the plaintiff," has filed a pro se complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, alleging that rights, privileges, or immunities afforded him under the Constitution or laws of the United States were abridged during his incarceration at the Madison Detention Facility. The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendation on August 22, 2013, recommending that summary judgmen..
More
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
INGE PRYTZ JOHNSON, Senior District Judge.
The plaintiff, Ricky Lee Scruggs, hereinafter referred to as "the plaintiff," has filed a pro se complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that rights, privileges, or immunities afforded him under the Constitution or laws of the United States were abridged during his incarceration at the Madison Detention Facility. The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendation on August 22, 2013, recommending that summary judgment be granted on the remaining claims in the complaint. No objections have been filed.
Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the Court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's report it due to be and is hereby ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Accordingly, summary judgment is granted in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff on all remaining claims in the complaint, the court finding no genuine issues of material fact remain.
A Final Judgment in conformity with this Memorandum Opinion will be entered contemporaneously herewith.
Source: Leagle
