GOODWIN v. U.S., 2:10cv313-WHA. (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20120615823
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jun. 14, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 14, 2012
Summary: ORDER AND OPINION W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge. On May 25, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 12). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED and that the 2255 motion filed by Goodwin is DENIED, as the claims therein do not en
Summary: ORDER AND OPINION W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge. On May 25, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 12). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED and that the 2255 motion filed by Goodwin is DENIED, as the claims therein do not ent..
More
ORDER AND OPINION
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge.
On May 25, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 12). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED and that the § 2255 motion filed by Goodwin is DENIED, as the claims therein do not entitle him to any relief.
Source: Leagle
