GIBSON v. COLVIN, 2:14-cv-24-RJC. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150604b88
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jun. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 03, 2015
Summary: ORDER ROBERT J. CONRAD, Jr. , District Judge . THIS MATTER comes before the Court sua sponte in light of Mascio v. Colvin , 780 F.3d 632 (4th Cir. 2015). The parties are hereby directed to consult one another and discuss, in good faith, whether the ruling in Mascio requires sentence four remand to the Commissioner. The parties shall then advise the Court via Status Report to be filed with the Court on or before June 11, 2015 on this issue, namely, whether remand is appropriate. The
Summary: ORDER ROBERT J. CONRAD, Jr. , District Judge . THIS MATTER comes before the Court sua sponte in light of Mascio v. Colvin , 780 F.3d 632 (4th Cir. 2015). The parties are hereby directed to consult one another and discuss, in good faith, whether the ruling in Mascio requires sentence four remand to the Commissioner. The parties shall then advise the Court via Status Report to be filed with the Court on or before June 11, 2015 on this issue, namely, whether remand is appropriate. The S..
More
ORDER
ROBERT J. CONRAD, Jr., District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court sua sponte in light of Mascio v. Colvin, 780 F.3d 632 (4th Cir. 2015). The parties are hereby directed to consult one another and discuss, in good faith, whether the ruling in Mascio requires sentence four remand to the Commissioner. The parties shall then advise the Court via Status Report to be filed with the Court on or before June 11, 2015 on this issue, namely, whether remand is appropriate. The Status Report must certify that counsel have, in fact, discussed Mascio and its implications in the specific case. If a consent to remand is not proposed and supplemental briefing is requested by either party, supplemental filings should be submitted on or before June 24, 2015.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
