Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Kenyata Burton, 08-10048 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 08-10048 Visitors: 31
Filed: Jun. 03, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JUNE 3, 2008 No. 08-10048 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 99-00321-CR-SLB-TMP UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KENYATA BURTON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (June 3, 2008) Before BIRCH, DUBINA and WILSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Alison Wallac
More
                                                           [DO NOT PUBLISH]


              IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                    FILED
                      FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                        ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                              JUNE 3, 2008
                               No. 08-10048                 THOMAS K. KAHN
                           Non-Argument Calendar                CLERK
                         ________________________

                  D. C. Docket No. 99-00321-CR-SLB-TMP

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


                                                                Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                    versus

KENYATA BURTON,

                                                           Defendant-Appellant.


                         ________________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Northern District of Alabama
                       _________________________

                                (June 3, 2008)

Before BIRCH, DUBINA and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     Alison Wallace, appointed counsel for Kenyata Burton in this appeal, has
moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief

pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Burton’s revocation of supervised release

and resulting sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer