Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. T-Shack, Inc., 2:16-cv-02664-JCM-PAL. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170530a42 Visitors: 15
Filed: May 11, 2017
Latest Update: May 11, 2017
Summary: CORRECTED STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING DEADLINES (First Request) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Plaintiffs, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and Defendants T-Shack, Inc. and High Noon at Arlington Ranch Homeowners Association, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the briefing deadlines, as follows: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the deadline for Defendants to file Oppositions to
More

CORRECTED STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING DEADLINES

(First Request)

Plaintiffs, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and Defendants T-Shack, Inc. and High Noon at Arlington Ranch Homeowners Association, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the briefing deadlines, as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the deadline for Defendants to file Oppositions to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 22] filed April 19, 2017, shall be extended from the current deadline of May 10, 2017, up to and including May 24, 2017.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the deadline for Plaintiffs to file their Reply to Defendants' Oppositions to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment shall be extended from the current deadline of June 7, 2017, up to and until June 21, 2017.

Pursuant to Local Rule IA 6-1 (a) and 7-1, the parties state the reason for extending the briefing deadline is to enable counsel for Defendants more time to evaluate and brief the issues raised in Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment. This the parties' first request for an extension of time to brief the Motion for Summary Judgment. The parties have entered into the agreement in good faith and not for purposes of delay. This is the parties' way of accommodating one another given the overall increase in litigation in their areas of law practice.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer