IN RE A.B., 2 CA-JV 2015-0190. (2016)
Court: Court of Appeals of Arizona
Number: inazco20160310011
Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 10, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 10, 2016
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES. See Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. 111(c)(1); Ariz. R. Civ. App. P. 28(a)(1), (f); Ariz. R. P. Juv. Ct. 103(G). MEMORANDUM DECISION ECKERSTROM , Chief Judge . 1 A.B. appeals from the juvenile court's October 2015 under-advisement ruling adjudicating him delinquent on two counts of aggravated assault and stating its intention to schedule a disposition hearing. Because the
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES. See Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. 111(c)(1); Ariz. R. Civ. App. P. 28(a)(1), (f); Ariz. R. P. Juv. Ct. 103(G). MEMORANDUM DECISION ECKERSTROM , Chief Judge . 1 A.B. appeals from the juvenile court's October 2015 under-advisement ruling adjudicating him delinquent on two counts of aggravated assault and stating its intention to schedule a disposition hearing. Because the ..
More
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES.
See Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. 111(c)(1); Ariz. R. Civ. App. P. 28(a)(1), (f); Ariz. R. P. Juv. Ct. 103(G).
MEMORANDUM DECISION
ECKERSTROM, Chief Judge.
¶1 A.B. appeals from the juvenile court's October 2015 under-advisement ruling adjudicating him delinquent on two counts of aggravated assault and stating its intention to schedule a disposition hearing. Because the court's adjudication of delinquency is not a final order, we lack jurisdiction to consider the appeal and, on our own motion, we dismiss it. See In re Alton D., 196 Ariz. 195, ¶ 8, 994 P.2d 402, 404 (2000) (appeal may not be taken "[u]ntil a final order is entered"); In re Maricopa Cty. Juv. Action No. J-74222, 20 Ariz.App. 570, 571, 514 P.2d 741, 742 (1973) (dismissing, as premature, appeal from adjudication of delinquency and holding disposition order "is the only final order subject to appeal").
¶2 Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Source: Leagle
