BRENNAN v. WISE, 11-00418-CB-N. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20150714585
Visitors: 24
Filed: Jul. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 13, 2015
Summary: ORDER CHARLES R. BUTLER, Jr. , Senior District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and dated August 28, 2014, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Petitioner Thomas G. Brennan's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2254 (
Summary: ORDER CHARLES R. BUTLER, Jr. , Senior District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and dated August 28, 2014, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Petitioner Thomas G. Brennan's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2254 (D..
More
ORDER
CHARLES R. BUTLER, Jr., Senior District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated August 28, 2014, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Petitioner Thomas G. Brennan's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Docs. 1, 2, 12) is DENIED, that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice, and that Petitioner is not entitled to a certificate of appealability or to appeal in forma pauperis.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
