Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Buenrostro v. Fajardo, 1:14-cv-00075-DAD-BAM (PC). (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180402868 Visitors: 17
Filed: Mar. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 30, 2018
Summary: ORDER REGARDING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS ON APPEAL Appeal No. 18-15488 BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Jose Luis Buenrostro, ("Plaintiff"), a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). On January 30, 2018, the Court dismissed this action for failure to state a claim. (ECF Nos. 64, 65.) On February 15, 2018, Plaintif
More

ORDER REGARDING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS ON APPEAL

Appeal No. 18-15488

Plaintiff Jose Luis Buenrostro, ("Plaintiff"), a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). On January 30, 2018, the Court dismissed this action for failure to state a claim. (ECF Nos. 64, 65.) On February 15, 2018, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration together with a notice of appeal. (ECF Nos. 66, 68.) On March 22, 2018, the Court denied Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration and directed the Clerk of the Court to process Plaintiff's notice of appeal. (ECF No. 67.)

On March 29, 2018, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals referred the matter back to this Court for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue for the appeal. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). The Court finds that this appeal is not taken in bad faith and is not frivolous. Accordingly, in forma pauperis status should not be revoked and should continue on appeal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer