WEBB v. HARRIS, 2:13-CV-855-WKW. (2016)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20161212643
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 09, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 09, 2016
Summary: ORDER W. KEITH WATKINS , Chief District Judge . Before the court is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. #45.) There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and based on a review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #45) is ADOPTED; 2. Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. #11) is GRANTED; and 3. The costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plaintiff. A final judgment will be entered separa
Summary: ORDER W. KEITH WATKINS , Chief District Judge . Before the court is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. #45.) There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and based on a review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #45) is ADOPTED; 2. Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. #11) is GRANTED; and 3. The costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plaintiff. A final judgment will be entered separat..
More
ORDER
W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief District Judge.
Before the court is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. #45.) There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and based on a review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #45) is ADOPTED;
2. Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. #11) is GRANTED; and
3. The costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plaintiff.
A final judgment will be entered separately.
Source: Leagle
