Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Anstalt v. Gallerie Degli Uffizi, CV18-1263-PHX-DGC. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Arizona Number: infdco20191008m31 Visitors: 10
Filed: Oct. 01, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 01, 2019
Summary: ORDER DAVID G. CAMPBELL , District Judge . The Court held a hearing on September 3, 2019. On the basis of the hearing, the Court will afford Plaintiff until October 25, 2019, to retain new counsel in this case. If Plaintiff fails to do so, Plaintiff's claims will be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's counsel has moved to withdraw. Doc. 37. A corporation cannot appear in federal court without counsel. Rowland v. Cal. Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory Counsel, 506 U.S. 194 , 201-2
More

ORDER

The Court held a hearing on September 3, 2019. On the basis of the hearing, the Court will afford Plaintiff until October 25, 2019, to retain new counsel in this case. If Plaintiff fails to do so, Plaintiff's claims will be dismissed with prejudice.

Plaintiff's counsel has moved to withdraw. Doc. 37. A corporation cannot appear in federal court without counsel. Rowland v. Cal. Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory Counsel, 506 U.S. 194, 201-202 (1993). The Court accordingly set a telephone hearing for September 3, 2019, and ordered a representative of Plaintiff to participate. Doc. 38.

The hearing was held as scheduled, and a representative of Plaintiff did not participate. Counsel for Plaintiff stated that he had sent Plaintiff several emails advising it of the hearing, including a copy of the Court's order. Counsel further stated that Plaintiff confirmed receipt of the emails, but stated that Plaintiff would not participate in the hearing. Counsel said Plaintiff gave no reason for declining to participate. The Court asked whether Plaintiff understood that a corporation cannot appear without counsel in federal court, and that Plaintiff's claims must be dismissed if counsel is allowed to withdraw. Plaintiff's counsel confirmed that Plaintiff was advised of this fact before it declined to participate in the hearing.

The Court also discussed discovery issues at the hearing. Plaintiff has failed to comply with its discovery obligations, despite the fact that less than three months remain before the close of discovery. Doc. 39. Defendant asserted that Plaintiff committed to correct the discovery deficiencies by July 24, 2019, but never did so. Id. at 2. When asked during the hearing whether he disagreed with these assertions, Plaintiff's counsel said no.

Thus, the Court is faced with the following situation: Plaintiff understands that it must be represented by counsel in federal court; Plaintiff understands that its claims will be dismissed if counsel is permitted to withdraw; Plaintiff declined to participate in the September 3, 2019 hearing despite being ordered to do so; and Plaintiff has failed to comply with its discovery obligations.

The Court will afford Plaintiff one final opportunity to comply with the Court's orders. Plaintiff shall have until October 25, 2019, for new counsel to appear on its behalf. If new counsel has not formally appeared in this case by that date, the Court will grant the motion to withdraw filed by current Plaintiff's counsel, dismiss Plaintiff's complaint with prejudice, and enter a default judgment against Plaintiff on Defendant's counterclaims. Current counsel is directed to advise Plaintiff of this order, and provide Plaintiff with a copy, immediately.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer