GONZALES v. RYAN, CV-99-02016-PHX-SMM. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20150305754
Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2015
Summary: ORDER STEPHEN M. McNAMEE , Senior District Judge . Counsel for Respondents has filed a request for ruling asking the court to prioritize its consideration of Petitioner's 25 remaining habeas claims. (Doc. 236.) The Court understands Respondents' position. As counsel aptly notes, the prescriptive time for ruling has not yet passed, and the case has a lengthy and complicated procedural history. Of course, counsel is also aware of the many cases that have been remanded to this Court for recons
Summary: ORDER STEPHEN M. McNAMEE , Senior District Judge . Counsel for Respondents has filed a request for ruling asking the court to prioritize its consideration of Petitioner's 25 remaining habeas claims. (Doc. 236.) The Court understands Respondents' position. As counsel aptly notes, the prescriptive time for ruling has not yet passed, and the case has a lengthy and complicated procedural history. Of course, counsel is also aware of the many cases that have been remanded to this Court for reconsi..
More
ORDER
STEPHEN M. McNAMEE, Senior District Judge.
Counsel for Respondents has filed a request for ruling asking the court to prioritize its consideration of Petitioner's 25 remaining habeas claims. (Doc. 236.) The Court understands Respondents' position. As counsel aptly notes, the prescriptive time for ruling has not yet passed, and the case has a lengthy and complicated procedural history. Of course, counsel is also aware of the many cases that have been remanded to this Court for reconsideration under Martinez v. Ryan, in addition to the Court's already heavy docket.
The Court appreciates the matter being brought to its attention, and is attempting to resolve the remaining issues in this case in due course.
Source: Leagle
