Martin v. Dotson, 1:16-cv-245-ECM. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20190313661
Visitors: 27
Filed: Mar. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2019
Summary: OPINION and ORDER EMILY C. MARKS , Chief District Judge . On January 29, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. 98). After an independent and de novo review of the record, and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: (1) The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (doc. 98) be and is hereby ADOPTED. (2) The defendants' motion for summary judgment
Summary: OPINION and ORDER EMILY C. MARKS , Chief District Judge . On January 29, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. 98). After an independent and de novo review of the record, and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: (1) The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (doc. 98) be and is hereby ADOPTED. (2) The defendants' motion for summary judgment (..
More
OPINION and ORDER
EMILY C. MARKS, Chief District Judge.
On January 29, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. 98). After an independent and de novo review of the record, and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:
(1) The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (doc. 98) be and is hereby ADOPTED.
(2) The defendants' motion for summary judgment (doc. 86) be and is hereby GRANTED.
(3) Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the Defendants.
(4) This case be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice as Plaintiff's claims are not properly before the court in this action.
(5) Costs are taxed against Plaintiff for which execution may issue.
An appropriate Final Judgment will be entered.
Source: Leagle
