Filed: Mar. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 23, 2012
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM M. ACKER, Jr., District Judge. On March 2, 2012, defendant, Noland Health Services, Inc. ("Noland"), filed a motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the above-entitled action brought by plaintiff, Lucy Mukuha ("Mukuha"). Noland's motion was accompanied by an evidentiary submission and a brief pointing out in detail that Noland considers to be the pertinent undisputed facts. This evidentiary material includes the deposition of Lucy Mukuha. On March 2, 2012,
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM M. ACKER, Jr., District Judge. On March 2, 2012, defendant, Noland Health Services, Inc. ("Noland"), filed a motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the above-entitled action brought by plaintiff, Lucy Mukuha ("Mukuha"). Noland's motion was accompanied by an evidentiary submission and a brief pointing out in detail that Noland considers to be the pertinent undisputed facts. This evidentiary material includes the deposition of Lucy Mukuha. On March 2, 2012, ..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILLIAM M. ACKER, Jr., District Judge.
On March 2, 2012, defendant, Noland Health Services, Inc. ("Noland"), filed a motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the above-entitled action brought by plaintiff, Lucy Mukuha ("Mukuha"). Noland's motion was accompanied by an evidentiary submission and a brief pointing out in detail that Noland considers to be the pertinent undisputed facts. This evidentiary material includes the deposition of Lucy Mukuha.
On March 2, 2012, this court entered a submission order requiring Mukuha to respond to Noland's motion for summary judgment on or before March 22, 2012. Mukuha has not done so.
In accordance with Rule 56(c), F.R.Civ.P., Mukuha not having asserted, much less pointed out, a genuine issue of material fact, leaves the court with no alternative but to agree with and adopt the facts as presented by Noland. The court sees no purpose to be served by restating or arguing conceded undisputed facts, and therefore respectfully declines to do so.
Noland's motion for summary judgment will be granted by separate order.
