Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

(PC) Cathy v. Hicks, 1:17-cv-00624-EPG. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20171121963 Visitors: 16
Filed: Nov. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2017
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE (ECF No. 13) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . On November 16, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice. (ECF No. 13.) All parties have agreed to the dismissal. Id. In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688 , 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493 , 1506 (9th C
More

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE

(ECF No. 13)

On November 16, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice. (ECF No. 13.) All parties have agreed to the dismissal. Id. In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) ("Even if the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by filing a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)."). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer