Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

VILLA v. UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CALIFORNIA, INC., CV 12-00318 LHK. (2012)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130102941 Visitors: 21
Filed: Dec. 12, 2012
Latest Update: Dec. 12, 2012
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION LUCY H. KOH, District Judge. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Plaintiff Nelson Gonzalez Villa ("Plaintiff") and defendant United Site Services of California, Inc. ("Defendant") through their undersigned attorneys, stipulate and respectfully request that this Court approve an extension of time for Defendant to file an opposition to the amended motion class certification motion to be heard on April 4, 2013.
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION

LUCY H. KOH, District Judge.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Plaintiff Nelson Gonzalez Villa ("Plaintiff") and defendant United Site Services of California, Inc. ("Defendant") through their undersigned attorneys, stipulate and respectfully request that this Court approve an extension of time for Defendant to file an opposition to the amended motion class certification motion to be heard on April 4, 2013. As grounds for this extension of time, the parties hereto state as follows:

1. The hearing on the motion has been scheduled for April 4, 2012. Currently the response is due on December 18, 2012 and the reply brief is due December 26, 2012. Due to holidays, Defendant has been delayed in getting documents and other information to prepare a response. Plaintiff graciously granted an extension of time for defendant to submit its opposition, subject to the Court approval.

2. There have been no other time modifications related to this amended motion.

3. The parties believe this extension will have no impact on the schedule for this case given that the hearing date will remain the same.

NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the foregoing, the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, stipulate to extend the time to file and serve an opposition to the amended motion for class certification to January 4, 2013 and the reply to January 14, 2013.

IT IS SO STIPULATED between the parties.

ECF ATTESTATION

I, Susan E. Bishop, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file the following: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMEDNED MOTION CLASS CERTIFICATION. In compliance with Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Mitch Allen has concurred in this filing.

Dated: December 11, 2012 BERLINER COHEN By: ____________________ Susan E. Bishop Attorneys for Defendant UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CALIFORNIA, INC.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer