GRANT v. U.S., 2:12cv386-WHA. (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20141211733
Visitors: 13
Filed: Dec. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 10, 2014
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge. The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. 18) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED and the 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion filed by Petitioner is DENIED with prejudice. A separa
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge. The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. 18) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED and the 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion filed by Petitioner is DENIED with prejudice. A separat..
More
ORDER
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge.
The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. 18) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED and the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion filed by Petitioner is DENIED with prejudice.
A separate judgment shall issue.
Source: Leagle
