Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Valdez v. Nielsen, 1:18-cv-00398-JDP. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180607a03 Visitors: 29
Filed: Jun. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 06, 2018
Summary: ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS JEREMY D. PETERSON , Magistrate Judge . Pro se petitioner Santiago Estrada Valdez is proceeding on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241, challenging his immigration detention since July 4, 2017. (Doc. No. 1, at 4.) The court screened the petition and directed respondent to file a response to the petition. (Doc. No. 6, at 2.) Respondent moves to dismiss the petition as moot because petitioner has been
More

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

Pro se petitioner Santiago Estrada Valdez is proceeding on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging his immigration detention since July 4, 2017. (Doc. No. 1, at 4.) The court screened the petition and directed respondent to file a response to the petition. (Doc. No. 6, at 2.) Respondent moves to dismiss the petition as moot because petitioner has been released on bond and is no longer in detention. (Doc. No. 13.)

The court will set a briefing schedule for respondent's motion to dismiss.

Accordingly,

1. Petitioner must file and serve his response to respondent's motion to dismiss within 30 days of the service of this order. 2. Respondent may file a reply in support of his motion within 15 days of the service of petitioner's response.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer